Preparing for 2026: How Annual IRS Adjustments Force a Reckoning in Cannabis Employee Benefits

Preparing for 2026: How Annual IRS Adjustments Force a Reckoning in Cannabis Employee Benefits




The machinery of the U.S. tax code continues to operate regardless of the current status of the industry it regulates. Every autumn, the Internal Revenue Service releases important updates through notices that outline cost-of-living adjustments affecting deferred compensation, retirement plans, and individual savings vehicles. For the cannabis industry, which relies on strict compliance and competes heavily for legitimate talent, these routine actuarial announcements create operational challenges that are anything but routine.

The recently published IRS Notice 2025-67, which outlines the 2026 limitations, functions as a non-negotiable deadline for human resources and finance departments across the sector. These adjustments, rooted in Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code, define the maximum amounts employees can place in their retirement accounts and, just as importantly, the maximum compensation base on which contributions can be calculated. Although these increases reflect economic realities driven by inflation, they create an immediate tactical necessity for cannabis operators. Organizations must update outdated compliance protocols or risk falling behind in the competition for skilled labor and potentially drawing unnecessary regulatory scrutiny.

The Unavoidable Signal: Why COLA Means Competitive Advantage

The IRS adjusts these limitations each year using a methodology similar to the adjustments made under the Social Security Act, which ensures that the real value of deferred compensation shelters does not erode due to inflation. For many traditional businesses, updating payroll software to reflect the higher ceilings is simply a matter of efficiency. For a cannabis company, it is a matter of strategic positioning and layered compliance.

A fundamental reality in the cannabis sector is that many states will penalize employers that fail to offer a retirement plan. As a result, proactively sponsoring a qualified plan, such as a 401(k), is often a necessary safeguard against state-level enforcement actions. When the IRS raises the allowable contribution limits, the value proposition of an employer-sponsored plan increases automatically. If you are not offering a plan, you are falling short of an increasingly common state requirement. If you are offering one but have not updated your administration system to reflect the higher limits, you are preventing your employees from accessing potential tax savings and providing less than what peer organizations already deliver.

The core message from Notice 2025-67 is clear. The baseline standard for professional employer benefits is rising.

Decoding the 2026 Key Limits for Cannabis Operators

While Notice 2025-67 outlines numerous adjustments across IRAs, defined-benefit plans, and various fringe-benefit rules, several figures directly affect the day-to-day competitiveness and administration of standard 401(k) plans used by most growing cannabis enterprises.

1. Defined Contribution Deferrals Lead the Way

The primary takeaway for most companies is the increase in the employee elective-deferral limit.

For the 2026 plan year, the limitation under Section 415(c)(1)(A) for defined contribution plans, which is the total limit that applies to both employer and employee contributions, is increasing from $70,000 to $72,000. This is an important metric because it affects the overall scope of the plan.

Even more directly impactful is the annual elective-deferral limit under Section 402(g)(1), which applies to contributions made by the employee, including contributions to the Thrift Savings Plan:

  • The limit is increasing from $23,500 to $24,500.

This $1,000 increase per employee must be reflected in payroll systems by January 1, 2026. Failure to implement this change means employees cannot maximize their pre-tax savings, which weakens the benefit package you offer in an increasingly competitive labor market.

2. Catch-Up Contributions: A Bonus for Senior Staff

For the valuable and experienced talent that cannabis operations urgently need, particularly workers aged 50 and over, the catch-up contribution limits also have increased, signaling that older employees can now shelter more retirement funds.

For generally applicable employer plans, not including SIMPLE plans:

  • The catch-up contribution limit under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(i) rises from $7,500 to $8,000.

This provides a $500 annual increase in tax-advantaged savings capacity for your mature workforce. Once again, the administrative systems, including record keepers and third-party administrators, must be programmed to accept and process these higher limits automatically.

3. Compensation Cap Thresholds

Perhaps the most significant factor affecting larger or rapidly scaling cannabis firms is the annual compensation limitation, which dictates the maximum amount of an employee’s salary that can be counted when calculating nondiscrimination testing or matching formulas.

The annual compensation limitation under Sections 401(a)(17), 404(i), and related provisions increases from $350,000 to $360,000.

This seemingly small increase can have significant fiduciary implications. If your plan document bases employer matching on a percentage of compensation up to the IRS limit and you fail to update the cap, you may inadvertently:

  1. Under-contribute. If you use a percentage-match formula, failing to account for the new cap means the company is contributing less than required under the plan structure when high earners are involved.
  2. Miscalculate Testing. If the plan relies on the compensation limit for certain nondiscrimination tests, an outdated system can produce incorrect compliance results and may even indicate a failed test to the IRS.

This constant upward adjustment of limits makes reliance on specialized ERISA expertise, rather than generic HR software, indispensable.

The Cannabis Multiplier: Why Routine Updates Require Specialized Oversight

In a federally scheduled industry, an IRS limit adjustment is never just an accounting change. It is a test of operational maturity. When you are working to structure plans that comply with current laws for employees in the cannabis industry, these adjustments require careful planning, precise administration, and specialized oversight.

Companies must address the fundamental conflict between state-sanctioned operations and federal tax law.

Fiduciary Responsibility vs. Source of Funds

When structuring a 401(k) for a cannabis business, the primary operational concern is fiduciary liability that arises from the source of revenue. Plan administrators and recordkeepers are federal entities operating under ERISA. Although the Treasury Department provides these COLA adjustments through Notice 2025-67, the actual administration of the plan must take place within institutions that are willing to process funds derived from activity involving a Schedule I controlled substance.

This requires administrators who not only understand Section 415(d) adjustments but also maintain strong compliance frameworks that meet anti-money-laundering requirements and banking standards. A generic administrator may hesitate during routine due diligence and refuse to process the paperwork, which could freeze access to employee retirement funds. That outcome would be a genuine operational crisis.

Talent Acquisition and the Appearance of Stability

The cannabis industry is known for high turnover, especially among scientifically trained personnel and experienced compliance managers. Offering competitive and predictable benefits is the most effective way to counterbalance this volatility.

When you are seeking top talent, presenting a fully compliant and up-to-date retirement program signals stability. You are competing against large, publicly traded, federally legal agriculture or pharmaceutical firms. If a candidate sees that your competitor is offering the maximum 2026 elective-deferral of $24,500 while your system is still set at the 2025 limit, that small administrative oversight becomes a significant perceived weakness in your organization’s commitment to its workforce.

As specialists who track industry trends have noted, the ability to offer sophisticated benefits such as a 401(k) is often essential for attracting industry veterans who have spent decades working within traditional corporate structures.

Beyond the 401(k): Other Key Adjustments and Strategic Moves

While the 415(c) defined contribution limit often dominates the conversation, Notice 2025-67 includes several other adjustments that affect strategic benefit planning, particularly with respect to tax credits and individual savings vehicles such as IRAs.

Retirement Savings Contributions Credit (Saver’s Credit)

Sections 25B(b)(1) outline the adjusted gross income limits for the valuable Retirement Savings Contributions Credit. For married taxpayers filing jointly, the lowest income tier for eligibility increases, reflecting necessary inflation indexing for lower- and middle-income workers. This is important because when the government indexes these credits upward, it underscores the broader societal importance of retirement saving today.

For a cannabis company, ensuring that employees know about and use these tax credits, which are often facilitated through proper W-2 reporting and accurate plan-participation data, increases the perceived value of the entire compensation package even if the company does not offer a matching contribution.

Deductible IRA Contributions

The phase-out ranges for contributions to Traditional IRAs (Section 219(g)) and Roth IRAs (Section 408A) are adjusted upward. For example, the deduction phase-out range for single filers who are active participants in a qualified plan increases to between $81,000 and $91,000, up from the previous $79,000 to $89,000 range. For married couples filing jointly where the contributor is an active participant, the range shifts from $126,000 to $146,000 to the new range of $129,000 to $149,000.

These increases mean that more employees retain the ability to deduct IRA contributions even while participating in the company 401(k). Coordinating communication between the employer’s 401(k) plan administrator and the employee’s personal IRA planning is a hallmark of a mature benefits strategy.

The Administrative Headache of Manual Updates

The entire IRS notice relies on cost-of-living adjustments determined through established governmental procedures. For plan sponsors, especially those administering what may be their first or second qualified retirement plan structure, managing these annual updates manually is a high-risk endeavor.

Every single limit, from the $280,000 defined-benefit baseline adjustment to the increase from $750 to $800 for Simplified Employee Pensions (SEPs) under Section 408(k)(2)(C), must be cross-referenced and updated within the plan documents, the Summary Plan Description (SPD), and the administrative software. A failure in any one of these areas can result in penalties under the complex framework of ERISA compliance reporting.

For cannabis companies, where operational focus is rightly placed on inventory, licensing, and state regulatory filings, assigning internal HR staff to track the minute annual details of IRS Notice 2025 67 without expert oversight is inefficient and risky. The cost of a compliance error that triggers an audit far outweighs the cost of specialized administration.

Conclusion: Moving Beyond Survival to Strategic Maturity

The 2026 cost-of-living adjustments released by the IRS are a clear reminder that the rules of established finance apply fully to the cannabis industry, whether its revenue moves cleanly through federal banking or not. Rising deferral limits create real opportunities to improve employee financial wellness, but those opportunities matter only if the underlying plan architecture is strong enough to withstand federal scrutiny.

Operational excellence in cannabis means treating benefits administration with the same rigor applied to seed quality or dispensary security. When the IRS issues a notice detailing limits that are inherently higher than the previous year, it serves as an invitation, and in many ways a mandate, to upgrade your infrastructure to meet the new standard.

Trust Integritas can help you structure plans that comply with current laws for employees in the cannabis industry. For more information, reach out to us at Trust-Integritas.com.

IRC 280E Still Applies to Cannabis Businesses: A Compliance Reality Check

Table of Contents

  • What is IRC 280E?
  • The Legal Challenges to IRC 280E
  • Emerging Advisor Positions on IRC 280E
  • What Regulators and Policymakers Are Saying
  • Our Compliance Recommendation

Trust Integritas

The Current Landscape

We’re observing a concerning trend in the cannabis industry: a growing number of operators have begun taking the position that IRC 280E no longer applies to their operations. Some are making this decision based on advice from legal and tax professionals. This strategic shift started before President Trump’s December 18, 2025 Executive Order on marijuana rescheduling under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

Our position at Trust Integritas is unequivocal: This represents a misinterpretation of current law and exposes businesses to significant compliance risk.

What is IRC 280E?

IRC 280E is the federal tax provision that prohibits businesses trafficking in Schedule I or Schedule II controlled substances from deducting ordinary and necessary business expenses on federal tax returns. For state-licensed cannabis operators, this means paying federal income tax on gross income (revenue minus cost of goods sold) rather than net income.

The financial impact varies by business model, but IRC 280E creates substantial tax burdens across the industry. While we’ve consistently advocated for reform, our compliance obligation is to acknowledge current legal reality.

The Legal Challenges to IRC 280E

The Track Record

Cannabis businesses have repeatedly challenged IRC 280E over the past decade on constitutional and “as applied” grounds. Trust Integritas has supported these efforts, including litigation involving industry stakeholders. However, the results speak clearly:

  • With the narrow exception of Champ v. Commissioner, no cannabis taxpayer has prevailed in an IRC 280E case
  • Courts have uniformly upheld IRC 280E’s validity when applied to marijuana businesses
  • Every constitutional challenge has been rejected
  • Limited victories have come only through COGS adjustments and specific refund requests

The Case to Watch: New Mexico Top Organics

New Mexico Top Organics, Inc. d/b/a Ultra Health v. Commissioner (“NMTO”), filed in October, presents the latest challenge. The central argument: marijuana is no longer “within the meaning” of Schedule I, despite its formal listing.

The case relies on:

  1. HHS’s 2023 determination recommending Schedule III placement
  2. Congressional spending bill provisions
  3. Proposed rescheduling initiated under the Biden administration

Critical limitations of this case:

  • The plaintiff operates as a medical marijuana business, not adult-use
  • No arguments claim IRC 280E is inapplicable to general adult-use sales (the majority of the market)
  • Any Tax Court decision could face appellate review in the Tenth Circuit
  • Relief, if granted, would not immediately extend to non-litigants

From a compliance perspective, pending litigation does not constitute legal change.

Emerging Advisor Positions on IRC 280E

The Responsible Majority

Most attorneys and CPAs continue providing sound counsel: marijuana remains Schedule I, and IRC 280E remains applicable. This represents the majority professional view and aligns with regulatory guidance.

Aggressive Outlier Positions

We’ve observed some professionals advancing positions that marijuana businesses are no longer subject to IRC 280E, or even claiming marijuana has been rescheduled (it has not). These positions often mirror NMTO’s arguments, sometimes extending them to claim applicability to adult-use sales.

Trust Integritas’s assessment: These positions, however creatively argued, constitute aggressive tax positions that expose clients to material compliance risk.

What Regulators and Policymakers Are Saying

IRS Position: Clear and Consistent

June 2024: Following HHS’s Schedule III recommendation, the IRS issued a memo titled “Marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance; IRC 280E still applies.” The Service specified this would remain true “until a final federal rule is published.”

Status: No final rule was published under the Biden administration’s rescheduling process. No final rule has been published following President Trump’s executive order.

December 2024: The IRS reinforced its position, noting that “some taxpayers have taken the position of disregarding the section 280E limitation using a variety of rationales that do not constitute reasonable basis.”

The term “reasonable basis” carries specific meaning in tax compliance (26 CFR 1.6662-3(b)(3)). Failing to meet this standard triggers penalties. The IRS communication is deliberate and direct.

Congressional Activity

Congress has not enacted legislation to:

  • Nullify IRC 280E’s effects
  • De-schedule or reschedule marijuana

All bills proposing such changes have failed.

February 6, 2025: The Congressional Research Service published “The Application of Internal Revenue Code Section 280E: Selected Legal Issues.” Despite IRS guidance, the report acknowledges “little tax guidance concerning the application of Section 280E.” It discusses several proposals that, if enacted, would eliminate IRC 280E’s prohibition on deductions and credits for marijuana businesses.

Key word: IF. Without enactment, IRC 280E remains operative law.

Our Compliance Recommendation

The Risk We’re Observing

The desire to claim deductions available to other U.S. businesses is understandable. Combined with aggressive professional advice in an atmosphere of potential rescheduling, we’re seeing:

  • More cannabis businesses filing returns that disregard IRC 280E
  • Amended returns seeking refunds for taxes paid under IRC 280E, contrary to IRS warnings
  • Some refunds being processed (with uncertain long-term outcomes)

Our guidance for any processed refunds: Set those funds aside through the full audit window.

Our Position on Current Compliance

At Trust Integritas, our advice is grounded in legal reality, not optimistic interpretation:

IRC 280E currently applies to marijuana businesses.

This position is based on:

✓ Marijuana’s continued Schedule I status
✓ Absence of a final rescheduling rule
✓ Clear IRS guidance
✓ Consistent judicial precedent
✓ Congressional inaction on reform

Looking Forward

We remain hopeful that rules will change for tax year 2026. We’re monitoring the Department of Justice’s next steps on President Trump’s rescheduling order, hoping for a final rule or better.

But hope is not a compliance strategy.

Until substantive legal change occurs, businesses that disregard IRC 280E are accepting:

  • Audit risk
  • Penalty exposure
  • Potential accuracy-related penalties
  • Interest on underpaid taxes
  • Professional credibility concerns

Trust Integritas’s Commitment

We understand the frustration IRC 280E creates. We support reform efforts. We advocate for fair tax treatment of state-legal cannabis businesses.

We also understand that integrity means providing honest counsel, even when the law is unfavorable. Our role is to help you navigate compliance while positioning your business for success when reform arrives.


For guidance on IRC 280E compliance, COGS optimization, and risk management strategies, contact Trust Integritas www.Trust-Integritas.com. We help cannabis businesses maintain integrity while managing the complex regulatory landscape.

Trust Integritas Takes Center Stage at MJBizCon 2025: HR Innovation and Strategic Leadership in Focus

Las Vegas, NV — What a week it’s been! Trust Integritas just wrapped an incredible four days at MJBizCon 2025, and we’re energized by the conversations, connections, and forward momentum happening across the cannabis industry.


Day 2 Highlight: Leading the Cannabis HR Revolution

The standout moment of the conference came on Wednesday, December 3, when our own Jewell Esposito, Managing Member of Trust Integritas, took the stage at the FlowerHire HR Leadership Summit at the ARIA Resort & Casino.

In her session, “Elevating HR to a Strategic Power Center,” Jewell addressed the industry’s top HR minds on how cannabis companies can transform their human resources function from transactional to truly strategic. Her presentation covered game-changing topics including:

  • Why fiduciary governance matters in a post-280E world
  • Executive compensation & retirement strategies that attract and retain top talent
  • How HR leaders can influence culture, stability, and profitability in 2026
  • Moving HR beyond compliance to become a business-driving force

The energy in the room was electric, and it’s clear: the cannabis industry is ready to embrace HR as the strategic powerhouse it needs to be.


Industry-First Whitepaper: Strategic HR Has Arrived

In partnership with Gemini Twin Consulting and other industry HR leaders, Trust Integritas is proud to have released the industry’s first whitepaper focused on the evolving role of Human Resources in cannabis.

“Elevating HR in Cannabis: From Transactional to Strategic Partner”

This groundbreaking report explores how HR leaders can drive measurable business impact by partnering closely with Finance and Operations on:

  • Cost containment without sacrificing morale
  • Workforce planning that scales with growth
  • Organizational development that attracts investors and talent
  • Metrics that speak the language of the C-suite

The whitepaper includes real-world case studies, practical strategies, and self-assessment tools to help cannabis HR professionals determine where they stand—and where they need to go.

The message is clear: as operators strive for sustainable growth, HR’s ability to influence financial and operational outcomes isn’t just nice to have—it’s essential.


Four Days of Impact: Trust Integritas at MJBizCon

Throughout the week, our team at Booth #C25929 engaged with founders, CFOs, HR leaders, and operators on the issues that matter most right now:

Day 1: Cannabis Capital in a Changing Landscape

We kicked off the conference discussing how evolving capital markets, fundraising trends, and investor sentiment are reshaping what operators need in a post-280E environment.

Day 2: HR as a Strategic Partner

Jewell’s presentation set the tone for conversations around leadership, strategy, and people—the backbone of every successful cannabis company.

Day 3: Regulatory Compliance is Non-Negotiable

As more states mandate retirement programs and fiduciary oversight tightens, we helped operators understand:

  • State-mandated retirement rules
  • Cannabis-compatible 401(k), PEP, and ESOP structures
  • How to avoid compliance traps and audits
  • Designing plans that attract talent and work under 280E

Day 4: The Final Push

On our final day, we doubled down on the conference’s biggest themes: regulatory momentum, capital conversations, and HR transformation. Companies that stay ahead of compliance win with better retention, reduced risk, and cleaner books for investors.


What We’re Bringing Home from Vegas

The conversations we had this week reinforced what we’ve been saying for years: cannabis companies need stronger fiduciary governance and future-ready retirement strategies.

The regulatory landscape is shifting—fast. Operators who act now will:

  • Stay ahead of mandatory retirement plan requirements
  • Build 280E-smart compensation and benefit structures
  • Create ESOP pathways that align employee and company growth
  • Implement multi-state compliance solutions that scale

Ready to Build What’s Next?

Whether you’re:

  • Raising capital or restructuring your organization
  • Exploring ESOP/PESOP strategies
  • Implementing ROBS for startup funding
  • Building 280E-smart executive compensation plans
  • Designing cannabis-ready fiduciary oversight frameworks

Trust Integritas is here to help.


Thank You, MJBizCon!

To everyone who stopped by Booth #C25929, attended Jewell’s session, or connected with us throughout the week—thank you. Your questions, insights, and energy reminded us why we do this work.

Vegas is awake.
The industry is shifting.
And Trust Integritas is ready.

Let’s keep the momentum going. The future of cannabis HR—and cannabis business—is strategic, compliant, and poised for sustainable growth.
Missed us at MJBizCon? Let’s connect.
Contact Trust Integritas, www.trust-integritas.com , to learn how we’re helping cannabis companies build stronger, smarter, more sustainable organizations.

Cannabis Legalization and State-Mandated Retirement: How Does it Affect Your Company?

Operating a cannabis business is inherently complex: navigating compliance with IRC Section 280E, securing banking partners willing to work with you, managing high employee turnover, and keeping day-to-day operations running in an industry that evolves rapidly.

So, when you receive a notice from your state about a “mandatory retirement plan,” it’s understandable if you’re confused or even frustrated.

However, this is not mere bureaucratic noise, it is a legal obligation. Failure to comply can result in substantial financial penalties.

This post aims to clarify why cannabis businesses are subject to these mandates, outline the consequences of non-compliance, and detail viable options for safeguarding your license, finances, and workforce.

Cannabis Legal Status and State-Mandated Retirement Plans

Understanding where cannabis is legal and which states require retirement plans helps cannabis businesses navigate compliance.

StateCannabis Legal StatusState-Mandated Retirement Plan?
AlabamaMedicinal onlyNo
AlaskaFully legalConsidering Mandate
ArizonaFully legalConsidering Mandate
ArkansasMedicinal onlyConsidering Mandate
CaliforniaFully legalYes
ColoradoFully legalYes
ConnecticutFully legalYes
DelawareFully legalYes
FloridaMedicinal onlyNo
GeorgiaMedicinal onlyNo
HawaiiMedicinal onlyIn Development
IdahoIllegalConsidering Mandate
IllinoisFully legalYes
IndianaIllegalConsidering Mandate
IowaMedicinal onlyConsidering Mandate
KansasIllegalConsidering Mandate
KentuckyMedicinal onlyConsidering Mandate
LouisianaMedicinal onlyConsidering Mandate
MaineFully legalYes
MarylandFully legalYes
MassachusettsFully legalNo
MichiganFully legalConsidering Mandate
MinnesotaFully legalIn Development
MississippiMedicinal onlyConsidering Mandate
MissouriMedicinal onlyNo
MontanaFully legalConsidering Mandate
NebraskaIllegalConsidering Mandate
NevadaFully legalIn Development
New HampshireMedicinal onlyConsidering Mandate
New JerseyFully legalYes
New MexicoFully legalNo
New YorkFully legalIn Development
North CarolinaIllegalConsidering Mandate
North DakotaMedicinal onlyConsidering Mandate
OhioFully legalIn Development
OklahomaMedicinal onlyConsidering Mandate
OregonFully legalYes
PennsylvaniaMedicinal onlyIn Development
Rhode IslandFully legalIn Development
South CarolinaIllegalConsidering Mandate
South DakotaMedicinal onlyNo
TennesseeIllegalConsidering Mandate
TexasMedicinal onlyConsidering Mandate
UtahMedicinal onlyConsidering Mandate
VermontFully legalYes
VirginiaFully legalYes
WashingtonFully legalIn Development
West VirginiaMedicinal onlyConsidering Mandate
WisconsinIllegalConsidering Mandate
WyomingIllegalConsidering Mandate


State-Mandated Retirement Plans: What Are They?

Increasingly, states are requiring employers to either establish qualified retirement plans (such as 401(k) plans) or register with state-run retirement savings programs—often Roth IRAs administered via state portals. These programs typically feature automatic payroll deductions for employees, unless they opt out.

The intent is to promote retirement savings among workers, especially in sectors like cannabis where employer-sponsored retirement benefits have historically been scarce.

The rules are relatively clear: if your business meets the employee threshold and does not offer a private plan, registration with the state program is mandatory. Employers must process payroll deductions and maintain opt-out records.

This might sound straightforward, unless you operate in cannabis.

Cannabis Businesses Are Not Exempt

Despite the industry’s federal legal ambiguities and often “off the grid” perception, state retirement mandates apply uniformly across industries.

Whether you run a dispensary with five or more employees, operate a cultivation facility, manage a manufacturing site, or provide ancillary cannabis services, compliance is required.

No carve-outs. No grace periods. No exceptions.

State regulators in California, Illinois, and Oregon have already begun issuing notices to cannabis businesses. Colorado is anticipated to follow suit shortly.

Penalties Are Real and Escalate Quickly

Many operators underestimate financial exposure. Non-compliance is far costlier than delayed deadlines or minor fines.

Take California’s CalSavers program as a case study: failure to register within 90 days of the deadline results in a $250 fine per eligible employee. After 180 days, that fine increases by an additional $500 per employee.

For a business with ten employees, that equates to $5,000 in penalties.

Other states enforce similar regimes:

  • Colorado: $100 per employee annually, up to $5,000
  • Connecticut: TBD
  • Delaware: $250 per employee annually; capped at $5,000
  • Illinois: $250 per employee annually
  • Maryland: No direct fines; forfeiture of $300 annual state fee waiver
  • Maine: $20 per employee from July 1, 2025, to July 30, 2026; $50 per employee from July 1, 2026, to July 30, 2027; $100 per employee on or after July 1, 2027
  • New Jersey: Year 1: written warning; Year 2: $100 per employee; Years 3-4: $250 per employee; Years 5+: $500 per employee
  • Oregon: $100 per employee annually; capped at $5,000
  • Vermont: Up to $10 per employee before October 1, 2025; Up to $20 per employee from October 1, 2025 to September 30, 2026; Up to $75 per employee after October 1, 2026
  • Virginia: Up to $200 per eligible employee

These are not theoretical figures; cannabis operators have incurred fines exceeding $20,000 due to non-compliance or assumptions of exemption.

Why Cannabis Businesses Are Particularly Vulnerable

In 2024, the cannabis industry faced a significant disruption as several major custodial providers unexpectedly exited the market, triggering a wave of 401(k) plan terminations. This sudden shift left many cannabis employers racing against the clock to secure new providers and protect their employees’ retirement savings.

Even with a growing workforce of over 440,000, cannabis businesses still struggle to access basic financial services, including 401(k) plans. Currently, only about 7% of cannabis employees participate in retirement savings programs, compared to 52% across other sectors. This stark disparity underscores both the challenges and the untapped potential for cannabis employers in 2025 to strengthen their benefits and workforce stability.

Operating in the cannabis industry already entails heightened scrutiny from state regulators, financial institutions, and tax authorities. Failure to comply with retirement plan mandates risks being interpreted as negligence by banks or licensing boards. Moreover, non-compliance can jeopardize license renewals, particularly as states increasingly incorporate labor and payroll compliance into their audit frameworks. Additionally, neglecting retirement benefits sends a discouraging message to employees about the company’s commitment to their long-term welfare.

Your Two Main Compliance Options

Option 1: Register for Your State’s Retirement Program

This is the fastest path to compliance, designed for small businesses without dedicated HR or payroll teams.

The process involves business registration, automatic employee enrollment, and payroll deduction facilitation without employer matching.

Advantages:

  • Low or no direct cost to the employer.
  • Simple to register.
  • No employer contribution obligations.
  • Quick compliance.

Drawbacks:

  • Roth IRA contribution limits are lower than those for 401(k)s.
  • No employer matching is allowed.
  • Not all state programs are cannabis-friendly; some may reject cannabis payroll funds.

Option 2: Establish a Private, Cannabis-Compliant 401(k) Plan

This option provides greater control and benefits, including employer matching, customized plan design, and enhanced employee retention and recruitment.

It also signals to regulators and financial institutions a commitment to robust compliance and operational seriousness.

Advantages:

  • Employer matching permitted.
  • Higher contribution limits.
  • Flexible plan structures.
  • Positive impact on workplace culture and retention.

Drawbacks:

  • Higher initial and ongoing costs (approximately $1,200–$3,500 annually).
  • Requires a provider willing to accept cannabis-related payroll funds.
  • Longer setup timeframe.

What About IRC Section 280E?

Many cannabis businesses encounter complications due to IRC Section 280E, which disallows federal tax deductions for employer retirement contributions in cannabis-related businesses.

While employer matching is not tax-deductible federally, its retention value often outweighs this drawback. Several clients report that modest employer matches reduce rehiring and training expenses by tens of thousands annually.

Ancillary businesses not directly handling cannabis plants may still deduct retirement contributions.

MJ Biz Conference 2024

Find us at MJBiz 2024, Booth #7442. We are EXPERTS in this field, recruited to speak before the federal government, lawyers, accountants, financial institutions. We have published guidance on all this (just Google the names of Managers Jewell Lim Esposito and Robert Ellerbrock).

Canna company: Various states will penalize you if you don’t offer a retirement plan. Wondering how to get a 401k plan, with a team who has collaborated together for decades?

HR or payroll company: Consider offering a 401k plan to your current canna clients and future prospects?

Financial advisors: It’s a $5B possibility for retirement assets alone in 2024. We show you how to be a part of it.

We’ve got what has to now be dog years of experience with the intersection of the law/IRS/DOL and the canna industry. In fact, we pioneered perhaps the very first canna 401k plan for the industry way back in 2018, still in existence today — and producing clean audits for several years straight.

Trust those of us who have been stewards to the cannabis industry for the very necessary duration to have navigated all the nuances. Trust Integritas.

Navigating KYC, AML, and OFAC Compliance for 401(k) Plans: What You Need to Know

As a financial service provider, ensuring compliance with regulations like Know Your Customer (KYC), Anti-Money Laundering (AML), and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is critical when managing financial products and services, especially if you touch even a scintilla of money in the cannabis business. Whether you’re advising on retirement plans, managing banking transactions, or providing financial guidance, your role involves more than just administering these services—it also means ensuring compliance with federal standards to protect both your business and your clients from legal and financial risks arising from the cannabis industry’s strict regulations.

The Patriot Act and Bank Secrecy Act: How They Apply to 401(k)s & Cannabis

The Patriot Act and the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) require financial institutions, including banks and advisors, to verify the identities of all customers and monitor financial transactions for suspicious activity. This practice is crucial when working with clients in or around the cannabis industry, as legal complexities between state legality and federal scrutiny can cause government agents to flag transactions as suspicious – potentially leading to penalties, asset freezes, or leaving you and your clients vulnerable to compliance risks. 

Recently, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) expanded its rules under the BSA that has significant implications for financial service providers that deal with any money from the cannabis industry. Although financial service providers already face hefty regulatory challenges, these new rules make the cannabis sector ripe for FinCEN to continue to scrutinize financial practices.

The new rule, codified as 31 CFR 1010.100(t), expanded the definition of “financial institution” to include SEC-registered investment advisors (RIAs), which must now implement robust regulatory programs to detect and mitigate risks tied to money laundering and illicit activities and report suspicious activity to FinCEN directly – particularly when transactions suggest attempts to bypass regulatory scrutiny.

The cannabis sector remains high-risk due to federal prohibitions, cash-heavy operations, and limited access to banking. Investment advisers must now ensure they scrutinize any funds tied to the  cannabis industry.

With FinCEN increasing oversight, advisers must proactively address these risks associated with the BSA. 

KYC: Are You Sure You Know Your Employees?

For banks and financial advisors, KYC goes beyond knowing a client’s name and address – it means thoroughly verifying the legitimacy of their financial activities. Any misstep in this process could expose both you and your clients to significant legal risk. Ensuring that every dollar in a 401(k) plan is compliant with federal law is especially crucial. Failure to do so could result in your institution being held liable for not performing adequate due diligence – even if you aren’t directly involved in 401(k) offerings. 

AML and OFAC: Are You Monitoring Every Contribution?

Under AML and OFAC regulations, financial service providers must monitor all financial transactions for suspicious or illicit activity. If you’re providing services to businesses operating in high-risk or heavily regulated sectors, such as cannabis or international trade, these monitoring efforts become even more complex. The ownership structure of businesses and the sources of their financial contributions must be carefully scrutinized to avoid violations. Non-compliance with OFAC can lead to civil penalties, asset forfeitures, or even criminal prosecution.

How Trust Integritas Can Help

As part of Trust Integritas’s review process, we ensure that financial service providers are relieved of the increasing pressure to comply with KYC, AML, and OFAC regulations – especially when working in the cannabis industry. These rules can be difficult to navigate, but non-compliance could threaten your reputation, clients’ trust, and your business’s long-term stability. Trust Integritas can help by providing expert guidance and compliance solutions tailored to your specific needs, ensuring that your services and your clients are fully protected from regulatory risks.

Updated: November 2024.

Come hear Jewell Lim Esposito explain what solutions Trust Integritas offers at the PBC Conference in Washington, D.C.

Come hear Jewell Lim Esposito explain how Trust Integritas and its staff have put together teams that include national, household retirement plan service provider names (investment advisors, mutual funds, custodians) who openly support the Cannabis Industry and 401(k) plans for the industry’s employees.  She’ll be speaking at the PBC Conference September 4-5, 2024, in Washington, DC. Stay tuned for more information!

A Move in the Right Direction

Potential Good News for Canna Companies.

Managing Member Robert Ellerbrock takes a look at the recent news coming from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”).

The DEA has stated that it will move to reclassify cannabis from a Schedule I to a Schedule III substance under the Controlled Substances Act.  The DEA will take public comments prior to publishing a final rule but only after the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) reviews the proposal and approves reclassification. The proposal would recognize the medical uses of cannabis, but it wouldn’t legalize it for recreational use. Specifically, the proposal aims to move marijuana from the “Schedule I” group to the less tightly regulated “Schedule III”. Here is what this reclassification means and its implications: 

Schedule I substances are considered to have no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. The proposal seeks to reclassify marijuana to Schedule III. This would mark a historic shift in federal policy. Schedule III drugs include substances like ketamine, anabolic steroids, and certain acetaminophen-codeine combinations. Unlike Schedule I, Schedule III drugs have some medical uses and are subject to various rules. However, they are still controlled substances. 

The reclassification to Schedule III would be a monumental shift for the cannabis industry. The move to Schedule III would relieve companies in the industry from Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code, which forbids cannabis businesses from deducting otherwise ordinary expenses (rent, payroll, etc.) from gross income associated with the “trafficking” of Schedule I or II substances. In addition, the change to Schedule III may allow cannabis companies list their stock from the OTC markets to the U.S. stock exchanges. Additionally, credit card processors, banks, and financial institutions will be less averse to doing business with cannabis companies, which could result in easier and more commercially reasonable access to credit and capital.

In regard to Cannabis 401(k) plans, the shift to cannabis being classified as a Schedule III may allow companies to take advantage of potential tax credits of up to $5,500 per year for the first 3 years.The reclassification may also allow for potential employer contribution credit of $1,000 (maximum) per employee. Nonetheless, not having access to credits doesn’t prevent a cannabis company from participating in a 401(k) plan right now.

While the DEA’s proposal is exciting for the cannabis industry, it is still a long way of implementation, as it must still go through OMB review,  the public comment period, and the rule making, which will need to make its way through the never quick bureaucratic process.

Even though it may be a while, the DEA’s decision to reclassify cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III is undoubtedly a watershed moment for the cannabis industry.

The Saga Continues… Cannabis Companies and 401(k) Plans

Managing Member Jewell Lim Esposito discusses the state of affairs for cannabis 401(k) plans.

Background re: the Tension Between Cannabis and 401(k) Access

About 8-9 years ago, the leadership of Trust Integritas, LLC, started structuring retirement plans (401(k) plans among them) for cannabis companies in the United States for a couple of reasons:

  1. Cannabis employees (of cannabis producers/distributers, hemp producers/sellers) should have similar access to retirement savings as their non-cannabis employee counterparts; and

  2. States were starting to mandate that businesses with as few as one employee had to have a retirement plan or else participate in the state-run plan (whose trustees or custodians would not always take cannabis retirement plan money, despite the state mandate and even when those who did not have a retirement plan or who did not participate in the state-run plan could be subject to costly penalties). 

Importantly, the Internal Revenue Code and ERISA permit cannabis companies to sponsor a 401(k).

Further and interestingly, under the Code and ERISA, typically (and just generally) a controlled group member who provides 401(k) perks to its non-cannabis employees must also extend similar 401(k) perks to cannabis employees, yet advisors to the non-cannabis employees refused to (and did not know how to) help with what really is a Code or ERISA fiduciary breach for not giving the same 401(k) benefits to cannabis employees. 

Thus, we needed to come up with acceptable solutions for cannabis companies to offer retirement plan benefits to their employees.  In so doing, we structured some 75+ plans, for about 8000-9000 401(k) participants.

Certain Financial Institutions Have Expelled Cannabis 401(k) Plans Off Their Platforms

Last year, we heard murmurings that various financial institutions were going to eject cannabis 401(k) plans ​from their platforms.  We had our suspicions that the ejections would start sometime in 2024.  Consequently, in late summer 2023, we chose to be proactive once again and to pivot to prepare these 401(k) plans for transfer onto other financial institutions’ platforms.  We wanted to step in where we could assist with transfers of what we know is above $75 million (at least with the plans we had structured). 

Conservatively speaking, we believe there are some 600,000 cannabis and hemp full- and part-time employees eligible to receive a retirement benefit.  That market translates to a possible $5 billion in 401(k) assets for 2024 alone. 

As we expected, the ejections started coming, often with just a few months’ notice.  These cannabis companies and their 401(k) plans are under a time crunch. Right now.  Some were told that they had to exit by June 30th; many others, by July 31st.  Anecdotally, we hear some companies are being handed a check that equals the total dollar amount in their 401(k) plans (forcing those companies to consider the impact of what may be a forced termination of a plan).

As we said, though, we had started exploring solutions in 2023.  Because we had engineered retirement solutions previously, we knew we could and should tap our wherewithal and to leverage the retirement plan service providers out there to address both the ejection and state mandate issues. 

Much of the time from 2023 to now has been each of us, retirement plan service providers, apprising one another regarding very drilled-down technicalities: the intersection of ERISA/Tax/Cannabis retirement, operations, payroll movement, reconciliation of funds, investment options, custodying of mutual fund shares and dollars, and the thoroughness of vetting to prevent financial crimes/money laundering (“AML” or “anti-money laundering” reviews) and ensuring that those working with 401(k) funds know with whom they are transacting (“KYC” and “KYB” – “know your customer” and “know your business” reviews that include delving into social security numbers, the “OFAC” (Office of Foreign Asset Control) and “SDN” (specially designated national and blocked person) lists).    

We had been doing this very intensive and ongoing (online) AML, etc. review since our very first cannabis 401(k) plan.  In identifying options for those cannabis 401(k) plans that were being ejected, we had to assure those retirement plan service providers with whom we were structuring solutions regarding the transfer issue that our AML, etc. procedures were comprehensive. 

We then solved for issues regarding who would serve as fiduciaries of these plans.  Many of the financial institutions we interviewed regarding any possible acceptance of a transfer of cannabis 401(k) assets wanted to ensure that those overseeing a cannabis retirement plan had the requisite and substantive experience.  The leadership of Trust Integritas had that, and we were taken to task, probed, and thoroughly scrutinized by various providers (and their executives and in-house counsel).

Finally, Approved Solutions for Cannabis 401(k) Plans

Subsequently, because of our long-standing presence in the ERISA/Tax/Cannabis space, we knew we had to weave together teams (a representative 3(38) who had confirmed that any investment option the 3(38) was putting into a plan would indeed accept cannabis money into that mutual fund, collective investment trust, etc.; a third party administrator; a record keeper; an auditor; a custodian; a bank; a knowledgeable corporate trustee; and investment fund managers and their trustees) whom we knew were top quality and who had already made the business decision to be in the cannabis space.